Conservation tillage mitigates the negative effect of landscape simplification on biological control
By Giovanni Tamburini, S. Simone, M. Sigura, F. Boscutti, L. Marini. 2016
136 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5bca446b73dfa1e009e1295e22a7e176bb2c10f6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Insect Science
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- The plurality of values in sustainable agriculture models: diverse lock-in and coevolution patterns (2018, methodology): “Legitimation and disqualification as processes for change and lock-in The institutional analysis of sustainable agriculture models by Therond et al. (2017) revealed the diversity of ways in which the values mobilized in those worlds order social relationships.”
- Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019, background): “Reduced tillage or no-tillage minimizes the disruption of the soil structure, composition and biodiversity with positive impacts on arthropods and biological control (Holland, 2004; Stinner and House, 1990; Tamburini et al., 2016; Triplett and Dick, 2008).”
- Avian pest control in vineyards is driven by interactions between bird functional diversity and landscape heterogeneity (2017, background): “plant diversity, sward height and heterogeneity) and semi-natural habitat cover in the surrounding landscape (woodlands and grasslands), as also suggested by previous studies of predation services in other agroecosystems (De la Mora, Garc"ıa-Ballinas & Philpott 2015; Rusch et al. 2015; Tamburini et ”