A Constraint Generation Approach to Learning Stable Linear Dynamical Systems
By Sajid M. Siddiqi, Byron Boots, Geoffrey J. Gordon. 2007
149 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Control and Systems Engineering, Ocean Engineering
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Sergey Levine
- Byron Boots
- Dacheng Tao
- Pieter Abbeel
- Chelsea Finn
- Arthur Gretton
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Yoshua Bengio
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Arthur Gretton
- Byron Boots
- Sergey Levine
- Daniel J. Lizotte
- Geoffrey J. Gordon
- Nuno Vasconcelos
- Milos Hauskrecht
- Zitao Liu
In Ocean Engineering
- Daniel J. Lizotte
- Nuno Vasconcelos
- Milos Hauskrecht
- Zitao Liu
- Antoni B. Chan
- Byron Boots
- Geoffrey J. Gordon
- Arthur Gretton
Citations in the corpus
- Hilbert Space Embeddings of Predictive State Representations (2013, methodology): “aximize each model’s performance: a 5-dimensional nonlinear model using a kernelized version of linear system identication (K-LDS) [22], ing a stabilized version of spectral subspace identi- cation [23, 24] with Hankel matrices of 10 time steps; and a 50-state input-output HMM (IO-HMM) trained via E”
- Bayesian reasoning and machine learning (2012, unknown): “3 Subspace Methods An alternative to EM and Maximum Likelihood training of an LDS is to use a subspace method[281, 249].”
- Convergent Fitted Value Iteration with Linear Function Approximation (2011, methodology): “Explicitly enforcing all of these constraints is intractable, so we employ a constraint-generation approach [20].”
- Hilbert Space Embeddings of Hidden Markov Models (2010, methodology): “In each case we compare the learned embedded HMM to several alternative time series models including (I) linear dynamical systems (LDS) learned by Subspace Identification (Subspace ID) (Van Overschee & De Moor, 1996) with stability constraints (Siddiqi et al., 2008), (II) discrete HMMs learned by EM”
- A Regularized Linear Dynamical System Framework for Multivariate Time Series Analysis (2015, methodology): “(Boots, Gordon, and Siddiqi 2007) develops a spectral algorithm that is able to learn a stable LDS by limiting the largest eigenvalue of transition matrix A to be less than 1.”
- Learning Stable Deep Dynamics Models (2020, background): “Alternatively, past work has also looked at different heuristics, such as approximately projecting a dynamics function A onto the (non-convex) stable set of matrices with eigenvalues Re(λi(A)) < 0 [3].”
- Layered Dynamic Textures (2005, methodology): “For example, Siddiqi et al. [ 23 ] learn a stable DT, which is more suitable for synthesis, by iteratively adding constraints to the least-squares problem of [7].”
- Modeling Video Dynamics with Deep Dynencoder (2014, background): “Stable LDS [4] tries to solve this by adding constraints on the eigenvalues.”
- Learning to Filter with Predictive State Inference Machines (2015, background): “Such systems have been studied in the literature as time-series modeling or system identification problems (Siddiqi et al., 2007; Chan and Vasconcelos, 2007).”
- Model Regularization for Stable Sample Rollouts (2014, background): “Siddiqi et al. (2007) addressed the problem of learning stable dynamics models of linear dynamical systems.”
- Kernel Learning for Dynamic Texture Synthesis (2016, methodology): “Although introducing a feedback control mode [21] or adding constraints to a relaxed system solution [24] can make LDS more stable, these mechanisms can only guarantee limited number of eigenvalues close to one, which may also cause the synthesized sequence to decay gradually.”
- Improved Learning of Dynamics Models for Control (2016, background): “Some of these approaches [13, 14] can provide performance guarantees in the infinite-data and model-realizable case (i.”