Electroweak precision observables, new physics and the nature of a 126 GeV Higgs boson
By Marco Ciuchini, E. Franco, S. Mishima, L. Silvestrini. 2013
162 citations recorded by the source corpus.
A bstractWe perform the fit of electroweak precision observables within the Standard Model with a 126 GeV Higgs boson, compare the results with the theoretical predictions and discuss the impact of recent experimental and theoretical improvements. We introduce New Physics contributions in a model-independent way and fit for the S, T and U parameters, for the ϵ1,2,3,b ones, for modified $ Zb\overline{b} $ couplings and for a modified Higgs coupling to vector bosons. We point out that composite Higgs models are very strongly constrained. Finally, we compute the bounds on dimension-six operators relevant for the electroweak fit.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5bb8ec2f85bb997e80c646f0927e694a0d1959ec
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- T. Stefaniak
- Oscar Stål
- Georg Weiglein
- Sven Heinemeyer
- Philip Bechtle
- Florian Staub
- J. Blas
- Laura Reina
Citations in the corpus
- Probing the Standard Model with Higgs signal rates from the Tevatron, the LHC and a future ILC (2014, methodology): “custodial symmetry Experimentally, deviations from the custodial global SU(2) symmetry are strongly constrained by the oblique (Peskin-Takeuchi) Tparameter [128,129] obtained in global electroweak ts [130,131]. Nevertheless, as an independent and complementary test, it is important to investigate th”
- Electroweak precision observables and Higgs-boson signal strengths in the Standard Model and beyond: present and future (2016, methodology): “nt for NP eects in the vacuum-polarization amplitudes of the EW gauge bosons and modify all EWPO considered here. The explicit dependence of the EWPO on S, T, and Ucan be found in appendix A of ref. [3] where it was also noticed how the EWPO considered here depend only on the following three specic ”