Estimating root system biomass from breast-height diameters

By M. Drexhage, F. Colin. 2001

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Mechanical Engineering, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5bb83632232d9082d006f95fc51d8a9cae554572

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. M. Río
2. G. Montero
3. R. Ruiz‐Peinado
4. S. Wagner
5. Christian Ammer
6. Hans Pretzsch
7. Isabel Cañellas

In Mechanical Engineering

1. M. Río
2. R. Ruiz‐Peinado
3. G. Montero

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. M. Río
2. G. Montero
3. R. Ruiz‐Peinado
4. S. Wagner
5. Christian Ammer
6. Hans Pretzsch
7. Margarida Tomé
8. Isabel Cañellas

Citations in the corpus

• New models for estimating the carbon sink capacity of Spanish softwood species (2011, methodology): “In the case of the species studied, the root weight model depends exclusively on tree diameter, as determined by Drexhage and Colin (2001) or Le Goff and Ottorini (2001).”
• An approach for modelling the mean fine-root biomass of Norway spruce stands (2005, background): “…based on the study presented here, we believe that it is possible to use aboveground information not only for estimations of structural roots (Santantonio et al. 1977; Drexhage and Grupber 1999; Drexhage and Colin 2001; Le Goff and Ottorini 2001) but also for estimations of fine-root biomass.”
• Biomass models to estimate carbon stocks for hardwood tree species (2012, result): “Belowground biomass models only include diameter as independent variable, as stated in other studies (Drexhage and Colin, 2001; Tobin et al., 2007).”