Robots should be slaves

By Joanna J. Bryson. 2010

361 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b9f4b2a2e28a74669df3789f6701aaed58a43d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

The Philosophical Case for Robot Friendship (2019, background): “Consequently, we should not try to avoid creating robot friends — as some have argued (Bryson 2010; 2018) — we should instead actively pursue the most valuable opportunities for robot friendship.”
Anthropomorphism in AI (2020, background): “…users’ emotional life and even if beneficial in some specific cases (for example, when enhancing the well-being of those who would otherwise be social outcasts) is not truly meaningful and it can only limitedly replace the richness of human interactions (Bryson 2010; Sparrow and Sparrow 2006).”
Designing and implementing transparency for real time inspection of autonomous robots (2017, methodology): “In the context of this paper, we use the term intelligent agent to denote the combination of both the software and hardware of an autonomous robotic system, working together as an actor, experiencing and altering the material world (Bryson, 2010).”
Ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics (2020, background): “On the other side of the debate, Bryson has insisted with a useful [but admittedly problematic] slogan, that “robots should be slaves” (Bryson 2008), i.e. not enjoy rights (Gunkel and Bryson 2014).”
'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage': Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions (2018, background): “In this sense, while algorithmic decision-making implicates dimensions of justice, it may also mitigate them, in so far as people resist imputing morality to a computer system [25, 5].”