The Boundaries of Privacy Harm

By M. Calo. 2010

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Privacy & Security

Citations in the corpus

Evaluating the Social Impact of Generative AI Systems in Systems and Society (2023, background): “Personal and private information has many legal definitions and protections globally [2] and when violated, can be distinct from harm [47] and refer to content that is shared, seen, or experienced outside of the sphere a person has consented to.”
Nudges for Privacy and Security (2017, background): “For example, Calo [2010] discussed privacy harms that can arise out of individuals’ lack of awareness regarding how their data is collected or used; Wang et al. [2011] studied user regrets caused by unintended disclosures on Facebook; Sleeper et al. [2013] studied regrets related to Twitter posts;…”
The Economics of Personal Data and the Economics of Privacy (2010, background): “As an example of the nuances of privacy costs, consider Calo (2011)’s distinction between subjective and objective privacy harms.”
Secrets and Likes: The Drive for Privacy and the Difficulty of Achieving It in the Digital Age (2020, background): “…from identity theft to price discrimination; from attention and time waste to psychological harm; from discrimination in targeted advertisement to filter bubbles; from stigma to rare but catastrophic personal consequences (see e.g., Acquisti, Taylor, & Wagman, 2016; Calo, 2011; Solove, 2005, 2007).”
Understanding Privacy Online: Development of a Social Contract Approach to Privacy (2016, background): “Importantly for business ethicists, privacy violations are experienced as individual harms (Calo 2011) and as unfair acts (Ashworth and Free 2006).”