Estimation of Tree Height and Stem Volume on Plots Using Airborne Laser Scanning

By Johan Holmgren, Mats B. Nilsson, Håkan Olsson. Forestry sciences, 2003

229 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Airborne laser scanning has the ability to measure the vertical and horizontal structure of forest vegetation. The aim of this study is to investigate how measures derived from laser scanning data can be used in regression models for estimation of basal-area-weighted mean tree height and stem volume on 10 m radius field plots. Influence of laser scan angle on tree height estimation and on crown coverage area estimation is also investigated. The study area was located in southern Sweden (lat. 58°30′N, long. 13°40′E). The dominating tree species were Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst .), Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and birch (Betula spp.). Linear regression functions (R2=0.89–0.91) used to predict basal-area-weighted mean tree height had a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 1.45–1.56 m, corresponding to 10–11% of average height. Scanning angle was not significant for estimation of basal-area-weighted mean tree height. Two regression models were used for prediction of stem volume. The first model (R2 = 0.90), with laser derived mean height together with laser derived crown coverage area as predicting variables, gave RMSE of 37 m3 ha-1, corresponding to 22% of average stem volume. The second model (R2=0.82), with laser derived tree height together with laser derived stem number as predicting variables, gave RMSE of 43 m3 ha-1, corresponding to 26% of average stem volume. The results implies that airborne laser scanning, if combined with a field sample, has potential of retrieving information with high spatial resolution (10 m radius plot) about tree height and stem volume for a forest area. FOR. SCI. 49(3):419–428.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b7d660afd8c751ce38013a9742a4299410b99b0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

  1. Terje Gobakken
  2. Erik Næsset
  3. Johan Holmgren
  4. Kaiguang Zhao
  5. Eduardo González-Ferreiro
  6. Ulises Diéguez-Aranda
  7. David Miranda
  8. Sorin C. Popescu

In Insect Science

  1. Terje Gobakken
  2. Erik Næsset
  3. Johan Holmgren
  4. Kaiguang Zhao
  5. Ulises Diéguez-Aranda
  6. Eduardo González-Ferreiro
  7. David Miranda
  8. Sorin C. Popescu

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. Terje Gobakken
  2. Erik Næsset
  3. Johan Holmgren
  4. Kaiguang Zhao
  5. Ulises Diéguez-Aranda
  6. Eduardo González-Ferreiro
  7. David Miranda
  8. Sorin C. Popescu

Citations in the corpus