Plant immune responses triggered by beneficial microbes.
By Saskia C. M. Van Wees, S. van der Ent, C. Pieterse. Current opinion in plant biology, 2008
883 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b7aaa3ac00d6c67baae04bd204ebc469effdbd9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Plant Science
- C. Pieterse
- P. Bakker
- L. C. van Loon
- C. Azcón-Aguilar
- M. Pozo
- Saskia C. M. Van Wees
- C. Zamioudis
- A. Sessitsch
Citations in the corpus
- Plant pathogen protection by arbuscular mycorrhizas: a role for fungal diversity? (2010, background): “…in the host’s gene regulation (Genre et al. 2009; Oldroyd et al. 2009) with the consequent production of specific multifunctional compounds (i.e. both involved in transduction pathways and capable to confer disease resistance) (Pozo and Azcón-Aguilar 2007; Liu et al. 2007; van Wees et al. 2008).”
- The rhizosphere zoo: An overview of plant-associated communities of microorganisms, including phages, bacteria, archaea, and fungi, and of some of their structuring factors (2009, background): “Other factors shown to have an impact on rhizobacterial communities include seasonal changes (Dunfield and Germida 2003; van Overbeek and van Elsas 2008), plant species (Grayston et al. 1998; Smalla et al. 2001) and even cultivar (genotype) within the same plant species (Van Overbeek and Van Elsas 2”
- Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. (2014, background): “(162) that ISR in carnation is associated with augmented accumulation of phytoalexins at the site of pathogen infection, a large number of studies with PGPR (1, 3, 14, 22, 64, 166, 177) and PGPF (56, 74, 83, 133, 137) have supported the notion that ISR by beneficial microbes is commonly based on pri”
- Networking by small-molecule hormones in plant immunity. (2009, background): “Like PAMPs of microbial pathogens, different beneficial microbe-associated molecular patterns are recognized by the plant, which results in a mild but effective activation of the immune response in systemic tissue”
- Use of beneficial bacteria and their secondary metabolites to control grapevine pathogen diseases (2013, background): “…in enhanced grapevine resistance to Fusarium rot—at least after P. fluorescens treatment—since the contribution of these signal pathways in enhanced resistance in Arabidopsis after treatment with different P. fluorescens strains is well established (van der Ent et al. 2009; van Wees et al. 2008).”
- Hormonal modulation of plant immunity. (2012, background): “…of hormone signal transduction pathways, via shared signaling components or downstream of signal transduction at the gene expression level plant diseases and pests in below- and aboveground plant parts (Lugtenberg & Kamilova 2009, Pineda et al. 2010, Shoresh et al. 2010, Van Wees et al. 2008).”
- Bacillus species as versatile weapons for plant pathogens: a review (2017, background): “Like SAR, nonpathogenic microbes trigger ISR which has also been shown in various plants and is effective against a broad range of diseases [74].”
- Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents (2012, background): “Specifically, Pseudomonas and Bacillus spp. are the rhizobacteria most studied that trigger ISR (Kloepper et al., 2004; Van Wees et al., 2008).”
- Induced systemic resistance in cucumber and Arabidopsis thaliana by the combination of Trichoderma harzianum Tr6 and Pseudomonas sp. Ps14 (2013, background): “These results are consistent with Shoresh et al. (2005) who reported primed gene expression in cucumber by T. asperellum T203 against Pseudomonas syringae pv. Lachrymans and with reports on priming of defense-related genes by P. fluorescens WCS417 in A. thaliana (Hase et al., 2003; Pieterse et al., ”