Plant growth and competition at elevated CO2 : on winners, losers and functional groups.

By Hendrik Poorter, M. Navas. New Phytologist, 2003

645 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b73f88ad0ccfb293fd62ae399b223279e85e073

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. C. Körner
2. S. Hättenschwiler
3. C. Rixen
4. Hendrik Poorter
5. K. McKee
6. J. Rooth
7. Mikhail V. Kozlov
8. E. Zvereva

In Global and Planetary Change

1. C. Körner
2. S. Hättenschwiler
3. K. McKee
4. José Climent
5. C. Rixen
6. I. T. Handa
7. Hendrik Poorter
8. M. A. Dawes

In Plant Science

1. C. Körner
2. S. Hättenschwiler
3. K. McKee
4. C. Rixen
5. José Climent
6. Hendrik Poorter
7. I. T. Handa
8. J. Rooth

Citations in the corpus

• Species‐specific tree growth responses to 9 years of CO2 enrichment at the alpine treeline (2010, background): “Therefore, the con- trasting CO2 responses in Larix and Pinus observed here cannot be explained by the previously proposed argument that faster-growing species are more responsive to elevated CO2 (Tangley 2001; Poorter & Navas 2003).”
• Consequences of simultaneous elevation of carbon dioxide and temperature for plant–herbivore interactions: a metaanalysis (2006, result): “…primary studies that are classified as pseudoreplicated in our database, indicating no difference between these and replicated studies (e.g. data by Callaway et al. (1994) and Bunce & Ziska (1996) used by Wang & Curtis (2002); data by Tjoelker et al. (1998, 1999) used by Poorter & Navas, 2003).”
• Where temperate meets tropical: multi‐factorial effects of elevated CO2, nitrogen enrichment, and competition on a mangrove‐salt marsh community (2008, background): “This result is consistent with other work showing that CO2 response of plants grown in isolation is not predictive of future changes in vegetation (Poorter & Navas, 2003).”
• The effect of elevated CO2 on growth and competition in experimental phytoplankton communities (2011, background): “The response of cyanobacteria resembles most physiological responses to elevated CO2 in plants, where growth response to increasing CO2 rapidly saturates (Neales & Nicholls, 1978; Poorter & Navas, 2003).”
• Biomass production and allocation in Jatropha curcas L. seedlings under different levels of drought stress (2010, background): “More recent metaanalyses concluded that changes in biomass allocation between leaves, stems and roots are minimal [41–43].”
• Competition increasingly dominates the responsiveness of juvenile beech and spruce to elevated CO2 and/or O3 concentrations throughout two subsequent growing seasons (2005, background): “In accordance with prevailing reports on grasses and legumes ( Poorter & Navas, 2003; Bender et al., 2003; Fuhrer et al., 2003), the present study indicates the responses of juvenile beech and spruce plants to elevated CO2 and O3 regimes to be dominated by the type of competition (i.e.”