Does cost-sensitive learning beat sampling for classifying rare classes?
By Kate McCarthy, Bibi Zabar, Gary Weiss. 2005
195 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Cynthia Rudin
- Giovanna Menardi
- Nicola Torelli
- Edwardo A. Garcia
- Haibo He
- Han S. Lee
- Junmo Kim
- Siong Thye Goh
Citations in the corpus
- Box drawings for learning with imbalanced data (2014, methodology): “(McCarthy, Zabar, and Weiss 2005).”
- Plankton classification on imbalanced large scale database via convolutional neural networks with transfer learning (2016, background): “Numerous approaches have been studied for handling with class-imbalanced data [6, 7, 12] by sampling the largesized data [13, 14] or duplicating the small-size data [15, 16].”
- Training and assessing classification rules with imbalanced data (2012, methodology): “Both undersampling and oversampling have known drawbacks (McCarthy et al. 2005).”
- Learning from Imbalanced Data (2009, background): “domains [11], [52], [53], cost-sensitive learning is superior to”