New records of non-indigenous gobies (Neogobius spp.) in the Austrian Danube

By C. Wiesner. 2005

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b35eeaec02ef4aadd561b510e9313863c8098ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

1. G. Copp
2. M. Fox
3. Rodolphe E. Gozlan
4. A. Vila-Gispert
5. J. Freyhof
6. P. Leunda
7. E. García‐Berthou
8. L. Gutowsky

In Ecology

1. G. Copp
2. M. Fox
3. A. Vila-Gispert
4. Rodolphe E. Gozlan
5. P. Jurajda
6. J. Freyhof
7. E. García‐Berthou
8. Carl Smith

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. G. Copp
2. M. Fox
3. Rodolphe E. Gozlan
4. A. Vila-Gispert
5. P. Jurajda
6. J. Freyhof
7. P. Leunda
8. E. García‐Berthou

Citations in the corpus

• Propagule pressure and the invasion risks of non‐native freshwater fishes: a case study in England (2007, background): “, 2005a) is associated with freight ships (Wiesner, 2005).”
• The recent distribution and abundance of non-native Neogobius fishes in the Slovak section of the River Danube (2005, background): “1 and Table 1) and large towns (i.e. Komárno, Štúrovo), its dispersal does not appear to have been entirely natural, with freight vessels probably being the vector of introduction into the middle Danube (Biró, 1971; Ahnelt et al., 1998; Wiesner, 2005).”
• To be, or not to be, a non‐native freshwater fish? (2005, background): “2) extended beyond the Middle Danube (Er}os et al., 2005; Jurajda et al., 2005; Wiesner, 2005) into the Rhine catchment of Germany, via the Rhine–Main–Danube Canal (Freyhof, 2003), with tubenose goby already present in the Dutch part of the River Rhine (Fig.”