Probing the Evolutionary Status of Starless Cores through N2H+ and N2D+ Observations

By A. Crapsi, P. Caselli, C. Walmsley, P. Myers, M. Tafalla, C. W. Lee, T. L. B. Unifi, Cfa, O. Arcetri, Oan and 2 more. 2004

306 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We have undertaken a survey of N2H+ and N2D+ toward 31 low-mass starless cores using the IRAM 30 m telescope. Our main objective has been to determine the abundance ratio of N2D+ and N2H+ toward the nuclei of these cores and thus to obtain estimates of the degree of deuterium enrichment, a symptom of advanced chemical evolution according to current models. We find that the N(N2D+)/N(N2H+) ratio is larger in more "centrally concentrated cores" with larger peak H2 and N2H+ column density than the sample mean. The deuterium enrichment in starless cores is presently ascribed to depletion of CO in the high density (>3 × 104 cm-3) core nucleus. To substantiate this picture, we compare our results with observations in dust emission at 1.2 mm and in two transitions of C18O. We find a good correlation between deuterium fractionation and N(C18O)/N(H2)1.2 mm for the nuclei of 14 starless cores. We thus identified a set of properties that characterize the most evolved, or "prestellar," starless cores. These are higher N2H+ and N2D+ column densities, higher N(N2D+)/N(N2H+), more pronounced CO depletion, broader N2H+ lines with infall asymmetry, higher central H2 column densities, and a more compact density profile than in the average core. We conclude that this combination of properties gives a reliable indication of the evolutionary state of the core. Seven cores in our sample (L1521F, Oph D, L429, L694, L183, L1544, and TMC 2) show the majority of these features and thus are believed to be closer to forming a protostar than are the other members of our sample. Finally, we note that the subsample of Taurus cores behaves more homogeneously than the total sample, an indication that the external environment could play an important role in the core evolution.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b0c6d6484d47b161bf0e916333c4cb11cbd04d3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. N. Evans II
  2. P. Caselli
  3. E. Bergin
  4. P. Myers
  5. M. Tafalla
  6. Cecilia Ceccarelli
  7. Mark R. Krumholz
  8. Simon Bruderer

In Instrumentation

  1. N. Evans II
  2. P. Myers
  3. M. Tafalla
  4. P. Caselli
  5. Á. Hacar
  6. E. Bergin
  7. Cecilia Ceccarelli
  8. A. Crapsi

Citations in the corpus