The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain

By Ariana M. Kelly. Emergency Medicine Journal, 2001

974 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b041c64286bdb3f4a282bc97767778fcea4700d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

1. O. Dikme
2. Achim Elfering
3. Ozlem Dikme
4. O. Karcioglu
5. H. Topacoglu
6. M. Haefeli

In Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

1. O. Dikme
2. Achim Elfering
3. Ozlem Dikme
4. O. Karcioglu
5. H. Topacoglu
6. M. Haefeli

In Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

1. O. Dikme
2. Achim Elfering
3. Ozlem Dikme
4. O. Karcioglu
5. H. Topacoglu
6. M. Haefeli

Citations in the corpus

• A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use? (2018, methodology): “The VAS is themostwidely used tool for estimating both severities of pain and to judge the extent of pain relief [8].”
• Pain assessment (2005, background): “Several attempts have been made to identify the amount of change necessary to be clinically significant [33, 40].”