A review and inventory of fixed autonomous recorders for passive acoustic monitoring of marine mammals: 2013 state-of-the-industry

By R. Sousa-lima, D. P. Fernandes, T. Norris, J. Oswald. 2013 IEEE/OES Acoustics in Underwater Geosciences Symposium, 2013

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b03e8aaa7700f67217452caf9d0b7891b647b67

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

1. Mark P. Johnson
2. Philippe Blondel
3. Matthew J. Witt
4. Susan E. Parks
5. N. Merchant
6. P. Tyack
7. Kurt Fristrup

In Ecology

1. Mark P. Johnson
2. P. Tyack
3. Susan E. Parks
4. Kurt Fristrup
5. Philippe Blondel
6. Matthew J. Witt
7. N. Merchant
8. Ari S. Friedlaender

In Oceanography

1. Mark P. Johnson
2. P. Tyack
3. Susan E. Parks
4. Ari S. Friedlaender
5. Douglas Nowacek
6. Peter T. Madsen
7. N. A. Soto
8. John Calambokidis

Citations in the corpus

• Measuring acoustic habitats (2015, background): “Over the past two decades, the development of cost-effective autonomous recording units has revolutionised bioacoustics in both air (Mennill et al. 2012; Digby et al. 2013) and underwater (Sousa-Lima et al. 2013).”
• Acoustic Indices for Biodiversity Assessment and Landscape Investigation (2014, unknown): “The change of scale in bioacoustics is supported by the recent development of digital autonomous audio recorders that can collect in an unattended way the acoustic activity emanating from terrestrial, marine and aquatic environments [23, 24] (Figures 1 and 2).”