Coal-exit health and environmental damage reductions outweigh economic impacts

By Sebastian Rauner, Nico Bauer, A. Dirnaichner, R. Dingenen, Christopher Lucien Mutel, Gunnar Luderer. Nature Climate Change, 2020

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5afe428a4c32d2ef5e3c26f242f7b78d45aa2ef2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. T. Wiedmann
2. Klaus Hubacek
3. Robbie M. Andrew
4. D. Guan
5. J. Minx
6. G. P. Peters
7. Yong Geng
8. Laixiang Sun

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. Yong Geng
2. Klaus Hubacek

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. J. Minx
2. T. Wiedmann
3. Robbie M. Andrew
4. Klaus Hubacek
5. Laixiang Sun
6. Dominik Wiedenhofer
7. Yong Geng
8. Manfred Lenzen

Citations in the corpus

• A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 2018 (2021, background): “…competitiveness of coal-based generation relative to alternatives, particularly solar PV, as well as its short-term health and environmental impacts, begs the question why many countries have continued to invest in coal capacity (Creutzig et al 2017, Lelieveld et al 2019, Rauner et al 2020).”