Evidence based conservation of butterflies

By Jeremy A. Thomas, D. J. Simcox, Thomas Hovestadt. Journal of Insect Conservation, 2011

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5af2df103cbf313a0f0c26c00dfd56b363245c78

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. G. Woodward
2. S. Potts
3. J. Ollerton

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Richard J. Gill
2. J. Ollerton
3. John M. Holland
4. T. Breeze
5. M. Garratt
6. J. Osborne
7. G. Woodward
8. Mark J. F. Brown

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. John M. Holland
2. G. Woodward
3. Nigel D. Boatman
4. S. Potts
5. G. Stone
6. Richard J. Gill
7. M. Heard
8. A. Vogler

Citations in the corpus

• Patch occupancy of grassland specialists: Habitat quality matters more than habitat connectivity (2018, unknown): “The risk of extinction in small patches is correspondingly high (Thomas et al., 2011; Fernández-Chacón et al., 2014).”
• Protecting an ecosystem service: approaches to understanding and mitigating threats to wild insect pollinators (2016, background): “…from databases such as for the UK Butterfly 441 Monitoring Scheme in which long term population data can allow powerful standardised 442 estimation of abundance in order to explore population trends and impacts of environmental 443 change (Oliver et al., 2010; Thomas, 2005; Thomas et al., 2011).”