A quantitative comparison of NIRS and fMRI across multiple cognitive tasks

By Xu Cui, S. Bray, Daniel M. Bryant, Gary H. Glover, Allan L. Reiss. NeuroImage, 2010

949 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is an increasingly popular technology for studying brain function. NIRS presents several advantages relative to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), such as measurement of concentration changes in both oxygenated- and deoxygenated hemoglobin, finer temporal resolution, and ease of administration, as well as disadvantages, most prominently inferior spatial resolution and decreased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). While fMRI has become the gold standard for in vivo imaging of the human brain, in practice NIRS is a more convenient and less expensive technology than fMRI. It is therefore of interest to many researchers how NIRS compares to fMRI in studies of brain function. In the present study we scanned participants with simultaneous NIRS and fMRI on a battery of cognitive tasks, placing NIRS probes over both frontal and parietal brain regions. We performed detailed comparisons of the signals in both temporal and spatial domains. We found that NIRS signals have significantly weaker SNR, but are nonetheless often highly correlated with fMRI measurements. Both SNR and the distance between the scalp and the brain contributed to variability in the NIRS/fMRI correlations. In the spatial domain, we found that a photon path forming an ellipse between the NIRS emitter and detector correlated most strongly with the BOLD response. Taken together these findings suggest that, while NIRS can be an appropriate substitute for fMRI for studying brain activity related to cognitive tasks, care should be taken when designing studies with NIRS to ensure that: 1) the spatial resolution is adequate for answering the question of interest and 2) the design accounts for weaker SNR, especially in brain regions more distal from the scalp.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5af02f05fb63e308ff84bcd692dd19709c14c508

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

  1. Gary H. Glover
  2. Andreas J. Fallgatter
  3. Ann-Christine Ehlis

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Gary H. Glover
  2. Arthur M. Jacobs
  3. Vinod Menon
  4. Catie Chang
  5. Peter A. Bandettini
  6. Rasmus M. Birn
  7. Brian Knutson
  8. Olaf Sporns

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

  1. Gary H. Glover
  2. Andreas J. Fallgatter
  3. Ann-Christine Ehlis
  4. Catie Chang
  5. Rasmus M. Birn
  6. Peter A. Bandettini
  7. Vinod Menon
  8. Brian Knutson

Citations in the corpus