The Korean language

By Ho-min Sohn. 1999

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languages (2020, neutral): “There is extensive discourse-level pro-drop (Sohn, 2001).”
Decomposing the left periphery : dialectal and cross-linguistic evidence (2004, methodology): “The following data are taken from Sohn (1999), Hagstrom (1998), and Nishigauchi (1990): (10) Korean akasi -nun [[[ku-ka mwues-ul mek-kess]-nya]-ko] waitress-TOP he-NOM what -ACC eat -want-Q -QUOT mwulessta asked 'The waitress asked what he wanted to eat' (11) Japanese John-ga [[Mary-ga nani-o…”
Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism (2010, background): “Different terms are used in different scholarly traditions, but the most common ones are ideophones in Africanist literature (Childs 1994), expressives for Austroasiatic languages (Diffloth 1976; Svantesson 1983), and mimetics for Japanese and Korean (Hamano 1998; Sohn 1999; Ivanova 2006).”