What's in a @name? How Name Value Biases Judgment of Microblog Authors
By Aditya Pal, Scott Counts. 2011
31 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Bias can be defined as selective favoritism exhibited by human beings when posed with a task of decision making across multiple options. Online communities present plenty of decision making opportunities to their users. Users exhibit biases in their attachments, voting and ratings and other tasks of decision making. We study bias amongst microblog users due to the value of an author's name. We describe the relationship between name value bias and number of followers, and cluster authors and readers based on patterns of bias they receive and exhibit, respectively. For authors we show that content from known names (e.g., @CNN) is rated artificially high, while content from unknown names is rated artificially low. For readers, our results indicate that there are two types: slightly biased, heavily biased. A subsequent analysis of Twitter author names revealed attributes of names that underlie this bias, including effects for gender, type of name (individual versus organization), and degree of topical relevance. We discuss how our work can be instructive to content distributors and search engines in leveraging and presenting microblog content.
Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
In Sociology and Political Science
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
Citations in the corpus
- Tweeting is believing?: understanding microblog credibility perceptions (2012, background): “[27] did not examine credibility per se, but asked users to rate how “interesting” a tweet was and how “authoritative” its author was, manipulating whether or not they showed the author’s user name.”