ESTIMATING SPECIES RICHNESS OF TROPICAL BIRD COMMUNITIES FROM RAPID ASSESSMENT DATA

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The 'standardized search': An improved way to conduct bird surveys (2003, methodology): “Some recent comparative research suggests the Michaelis–Menten equations may be even more robust, despite being slightly more complex to compute (Herzog et al. 2002; Longino et al. 2002).”
Using the Species-Area Relationship to Set Baseline Targets for Conservation (2004, methodology): “…and Bootstrap) were used in the comparative analyses, as the others (Michaelis-Menten runs, Michaelis-Menten means, and Cole) have not been widely tested for this purpose in the literature (Brose 2002, Herzog et al. 2002, Chiarucci et al. 2003, Petersen et al. 2003, Turnipseed et al. 2003).”
The elevational gradient in Andean bird species richness at the local scale: a foothill peak and a high‐elevation plateau (2005, methodology): “The survey method is detailed in Herzog et al. (2002) and only briefly summarized here.”
The concepts of bias, precision and accuracy, and their use in testing the performance of species richness estimators, with a literature review of estimator performance (2005, methodology): “This measure has also been called percent of true or total richness (PTR) (Brose 2002, Herzog et al. 2002).”