Eating Meat: Evolution, Patterns, and Consequences

By V. Smil. 2002

204 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Animal Science and Zoology, Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ae28bde097331437ad256f8b3615d7bc8880bf7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Animal Science and Zoology

1. A. van Huis
2. J. Sobal

In Ecology

1. Elke Stehfest
2. A. van Huis
3. J. Sobal
4. M. Ruby

Citations in the corpus

• MEN, MEAT, AND MARRIAGE: MODELS OF MASCULINITY (2005, background): “…meat is promoted by globalization of the meat industry, standardizing the world steer, and making meat more affordable to the masses, in an extension of the earlier colonial development of social structures for producing masculine meat products for consumption (Gouveia and Juska 2002; Smil 2002).”
• Long-term global availability of food: continued abundance or new scarcity? (2008, background): “When incomes rise, humans veer back to a higher consumption oflivestock-based foods and even tend to raise this consumption beyond what is wholesome, given their reduced physical activity (Popkin et a!., 2001; Smil, 2002).”
• Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security. (2013, background): “5 for chicken, 5 for pork, and 10 for beef (134).”
• Climate benefits of changing diet (2009, background): “While some authors have recently suggested reducing meat consumption via a special tax, others stress that no large changes can be expected through price mechanisms (Smil 2002).”