Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Co‐evolution of Firms, Technology and National Institutions

By G. Owen. 2005

464 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Sustainability Entrepreneurship and Equitable Transitions to a Low-Carbon Economy (2006, methodology): “In order to investigate this idea, this article develops a co-evolutionary framework that links the interactive dynamics of change in technologies, institutions and ‘business strategies’, drawing on recent thinking in this area (Nelson 1995, 2005; Murmann 2003; Beinhocker 2006).”
Co-evolution in contemporary economic geography: towards a theoretical framework (2018, background): “In a similar vein, Murmann (2003) argues that ‘two evolving populations coevolve if and only if they both have a significant causal impact on each other’s ability to persist’ (p. 22).”
The Evolution of Management Models: A Neo-Schumpeterian Theory (2018, background): “…antecedents, following the path traced by a neo-Schumpeterian generation, most notably Freeman (Freeman, 1994; Freeman and Soete, 1997; Freeman and Loucxã, 2001; Freeman, 2008) and Perez (2002, 2007, 2010); see also Murmann (2003, 2013), Nelson and Winter (1982), and Winter and Szulanski (2001).”
Physical attraction and the geography of knowledge sourcing in multinational enterprises (2011, background): “…local innovation systems knowledge is distributed across various actors, and the connections between actors matter since the knowledge on which innovations depend is never entirely generated within the same firm, but draws upon a wider structure of knowledge creation (Malerba, 2002; Murmann, 2003).”