Implicit Bias in the Courtroom
By Jerry Kang, Mark W. Bennett, Devon W. Carbado, P. Casey, Nilanjana Dasgupta, David L. Faigman, R. Godsil, A. Greenwald, Justin D. Levinson, Jennifer L. Mnookin. 2012
229 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5acdfa8829f5e698c62cb11129fb48496626e74c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Esther Duflo
- Marianne Bertrand
- B. Kutateladze
- Timothy Baldwin
- Jey Han Lau
- Nancy R. Andiloro
- Kobi Leins
- Cheryl Staats
Citations in the corpus
- Give Me Convenience and Give Her Death: Who Should Decide What Uses of NLP are Appropriate, and on What Basis? (2020, background): “ty of the defendant or the time of the day when the judge make a decision, and how this impacts on decision-making (Zatz and Hagan, 1985; Stevenson and Friedman, 1994; Snowball and Weatherburn, 2007; Kang et al., 2011). The French government has, however, under Article 33 of the Justice Reform Act m”
- Understanding Implicit Bias: What Educators Should Know. (2016, background): “This approach for challenging biases is valuable not just for educators but also for the students they teach, as some scholars suggest that photographs and décor that expose individuals to counter-stereotypical exemplars can activate new mental associa tions.(23) While implicit associations may not”
- Field Experiments on Discrimination (2016, background): “Kang et al. (2012) discuss possible ways to import these techniques to the courtroom.”
- Opening Pandora’s Box: How Does Defendant Race Influence Plea Bargaining? (2016, background): “Media coverage, political debates and popular discourse reify social stereotypes surrounding the perception of minority offenders as criminally prone, drug addicted, dangerous, and violent (Chiricos, McEntire, & Gertz, 2001; Kang et al., 2012).”