A Critical Review of Rural Poverty Literature: Is There Truly a Rural Effect?

By B. Weber, L. Jensen, K. Miller, J. Mosley, M. Fisher. 2005

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ab3680f0ed18e124c805c55a85bbe3fcbe5e9e1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Drake E. Warren
2. Edward J. Feser
3. A. Isserman
4. J. Essletzbichler
5. Brigitte S. Waldorf
6. F. Quatraro
7. C. Ghisetti

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. Drake E. Warren
2. Edward J. Feser
3. Brigitte S. Waldorf

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Drake E. Warren
2. Edward J. Feser
3. A. Isserman
4. D. Lichter
5. Kenneth M. Johnson
6. Brigitte S. Waldorf

Citations in the corpus

• Why Some Rural Places Prosper and Others Do Not (2009, background): “Having opted to include poverty despite this shortcoming because of its singular prominence in rural research (Weber et al., 2005), including a second, similarly flawed variable seems even less compelling.”
• Distance from Urban Agglomeration Economies and Rural Poverty (2008, unknown): “In their survey, although Weber et al. (2005) conclude that poverty is higher and more persistent in the more remote rural counties, they were reluctant to describe this as a rural effect.”
• The Changing Spatial Concentration of America's Rural Poor Population* (2007, background): “According to Weber et al. (2005), poverty in America has several distinguishing features.”