Reorientation in a rhombic environment: No evidence for an encapsulated geometric module

By Almut Hupbach, Lynn Nadel. 2005

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5aabd27be913fde663b56332f5e2aa9467bb9ae1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

1. Neil Burgess
2. Elizabeth S. Spelke

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Elizabeth S. Spelke
2. Neil Burgess
3. Klaus Oberauer

In Statistics and Probability

1. Neil Burgess
2. Elizabeth S. Spelke
3. Susan Carey
4. David C. Geary

Citations in the corpus

• Natural Number and Natural Geometry (2011, background): “4 Displays and findings from studies of reorientation by length and by angle in (A) a connected rhomboid environment (after [63]), (B) a circular environment containing a fragmented rhombus with no informative aspect ratio, or (C and D) a circular environment containing two angles differing in size ”
• Spatial Cognition and the Brain (2008, methodology): “…reorient in slightly different reorientation experiments, such as when using larger (Learmonth et al. 2002; Sovrano & Vallortigara 2006), rhombic (Hupbach & Nadel 2005), or symmetrical (Nardini et al. 2007; McGregor et al. 2004) enclosures, or learning over repeated trials (Cheng 1986;…”