What are we saving? Developing a standardized approach for conservation action

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Toward a systematic approach for identifying conservation flagships (2011, background): “In contrast, many traditional campaigns simply choose one of a handful of well-known flagship species, only because they are familiar to the target audience and guarantee some level of response (cf. Clucas et al. 2008; Sitas et al. 2009).”
Identifying Cinderella species: uncovering mammals with conservation flagship appeal (2012, unknown): “The human fascination with large animals is widely recorded (Clucas et al. 2008; Smith et al. 2010) and influences conservation research (Sitas et al. 2009) and policy (Knegtering et al. 2011).”
Stated preferences for tropical wildlife conservation amongst distant beneficiaries: Charisma, endemism, scope and substitution effects (2012, unknown): “However, this is case-specific, and a recent study reports that many threatened species, in particular , those which are uncharismatic or poorly known currently receive little or no conservation action (Clucas et al., 2008; Sitas et al., 2009).”
Insular bats and research effort: a review of global patterns and priorities (2017, methodology): “To quantify research effort, we used numbers of publications, as this has been shown to serve as a useful surrogate for the allocation of global conservation resources (Fazey et al. 2005, Sitas et al. 2009, de Lima et al. 2011).”