Randomization in the Design of Experiments
By David R. Cox. 2009
70 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5aa4b154139ea79174849e47d4be17ab4063b719
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Statistics and Probability
- Peng Ding
- Xinran Li
- Kari Lock Morgan
- Donald B. Rubin
- Tyler J. VanderWeele
- Peter C. Austin
- Qingyuan Zhao
- Elizabeth A. Stuart
Citations in the corpus
- Rerandomization and regression adjustment (2019, methodology): “The CRE balances covariates on average, but an unlucky draw of the treatment vector can result in large covariate imbalance (Student, 1938; Cox, 1982, 2009; Bruhn and McKenzie, 2009; Morgan and Rubin, 2012).”
- Rerandomization to improve covariate balance in experiments (2012, methodology): “(22) One possible method of rerandomization, suggested by Moulton (2004), Maclure et al. (2006), Bruhn and McKenzie (2009) and Cox (2009), is to place bounds separately on each entry of XT −XC and ensure that each covariate difference is within its specified caliper.”