A new method for scoring additive multi‐attribute value models using pairwise rankings of alternatives

By P. Hansen, Franz Ombler. 2008

312 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a95563aa5045b008a7a3f79d8eb3af897dce96a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Maarten J. IJzerman
2. N. Devlin
3. P. Moja

In General Decision Sciences

1. P. Moja

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. P. Moja
2. P. Thokala

Citations in the corpus

• Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. (2016, methodology): “PAPRIKA uses quantitative methods based on linear programming to also estimate weights and scores simultaneously.”
• Prioritization of pathogens to guide discovery, research and development of new antibiotics for drug resistant bacterial infections, including tuberculosis (2017, methodology): “In the PAPRIKA method, each survey participant is asked to rank a series of pairs of hypothetical bacteria defined on only two criteria at a time (61).”