British Columbia's revenue-neutral carbon tax: A review of the latest "grand experiment" in environmental policy
362 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a94be33a0ba39c8212bb200274edf72c173e2f4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- E. Haites
- G. Semieniuk
- Jean-François Mercure
- N. Edwards
- M. Mehling
- Ulrich Volz
- Endre Tvinnereim
- Emanuele Campiglio
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- E. Haites
- G. Semieniuk
- Jean-François Mercure
- N. Edwards
- M. Mehling
- Ulrich Volz
- Endre Tvinnereim
- Emanuele Campiglio
Citations in the corpus
- Low‐carbon transition risks for finance (2020, background): “Experimental evidence shows that using revenues for public good provision improves acceptance of carbon taxes (Beiser-McGrath and Bernauer, 2019), and the carbon taxes in Canadian provinces have received more acceptance after they had been implemented with revenue recycling (Murray and Rivers, 2015)”
- Carbon pricing and deep decarbonisation (2018, methodology): “Computable general equilibrium modelling and econometric differencein-difference studies of the carbon tax introduced in British Columbia in 2008 suggest that it resulted in a 5–15% decline in fossil fuel use by 2012 (Murray and Rivers, 2015).”
- Carbon taxes and greenhouse gas emissions trading systems: what have we learned? (2018, background): “Murray and Rivers (2015) presents six estimates plus Lawley and Thivierge (2018).”