Savanna Vegetation-Fire-Climate Relationships Differ Among Continents

By C. Lehmann, T. M. Anderson, M. Sankaran, Steven Higgins, Sally Archibald, W. Hoffmann, Niall P. Hanan, Richard J. Williams, R. Fensham, J. Felfili and 12 more. Science, 2014

628 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Surveying Savannas Savannas are structurally similar across the three major continents where they occur, leading to the assumption that the factors controlling vegetation structure and function are broadly similar, too. Lehmann et al. (p. 548) report the results of an extensive analysis of ground-based tree abundance in savannas, sampled at more than 2000 sites in Africa, Australia, and South America. All savannas, independent of region, shared a common functional property in the way that moisture and fire regulated tree abundance. However, despite qualitative similarity in the moisture–fire–tree-biomass relationships among continents, key quantitative differences exist among the three regions, presumably as a result of unique evolutionary histories and climatic domains. Evolution cannot be overlooked when aiming to predict the potential global impacts on savanna dynamics in a warming world. Ecologists have long sought to understand the factors controlling the structure of savanna vegetation. Using data from 2154 sites in savannas across Africa, Australia, and South America, we found that increasing moisture availability drives increases in fire and tree basal area, whereas fire reduces tree basal area. However, among continents, the magnitude of these effects varied substantially, so that a single model cannot adequately represent savanna woody biomass across these regions. Historical and environmental differences drive the regional variation in the functional relationships between woody vegetation, fire, and climate. These same differences will determine the regional responses of vegetation to future climates, with implications for global carbon stocks.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a9133349248ca28a2f8334049710bdb52d5a3ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

  1. E. Edwards
  2. Michael J. Donoghue

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. A. Oliveira-Filho
  2. E. Edwards
  3. R. Pennington
  4. Heraldo L. Vasconcelos
  5. Michael J. Donoghue
  6. David A. Keith
  7. Nicholas J. Murray
  8. B. Murphy

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. E. Edwards
  2. R. Pennington
  3. Michael J. Donoghue
  4. A. Oliveira-Filho
  5. Heraldo L. Vasconcelos
  6. J. Rodríguez
  7. David A. Keith
  8. Lucie Bland

Citations in the corpus