Comparison of various concepts of a random attractor:¶ A case study

By M. Scheutzow. 2002

72 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Mathematical Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a8d3b5aaacbc92f128b381febb93d250c3879f0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

1. Bixiang Wang
2. Kening Lu
3. Peter W. Bates
4. D. Cheban
5. Igor D. Chueshov
6. M. Scheutzow
7. Irena Lasiecka
8. Anhui Gu

In Mathematical Physics

1. Bixiang Wang
2. Kening Lu
3. D. Cheban
4. Igor D. Chueshov
5. Peter W. Bates
6. M. Scheutzow
7. Irena Lasiecka
8. A. Kh. Khanmamedov

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

1. D. Cheban
2. Igor D. Chueshov
3. M. Scheutzow
4. Kening Lu

Citations in the corpus

• The relationship between pullback, forward and global attractors (2004, background): “[28] M. Scheutzow.”
• ATTRACTORS FOR STOCHASTIC LATTICE DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS (2006, background): “Examples of point attractors and set attractors can be found in [37], [16] and also in [2] (Theorem 9.”
• On the structure of attractors and invariant measures for a class of monotone random systems (2004, background): “Þ f0g is a weak attractor but ‘not’ a pullback attractor (see Scheutzow 2002, Example 2.7 (iii)).”