Parameterized transmittance model for direct beam and circumsolar spectral irradiance

By Christian A. Gueymard. 2001

829 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a7b94d3db89a607ffdb81eac89b74cd81fdaffe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Atmospheric Science

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Penetration of UV-visible solar radiation in the global oceans: Insights from ocean color remote sensing (2013, background): “Many years of study have resulted in models to accurately estimate Ed( , 0 ) based on solar elevation and atmospheric properties [Gregg and Carder, 1990; Gueymard, 2001].”
Direct normal irradiance related definitions and applications: The circumsolar issue (2014, methodology): “These SMARTS results have been validated against more rigorous calculations of spectral circumsolar irradiance (Gueymard, 2001; Kocifaj and Gueymard, 2011).”
Band gap‐voltage offset and energy production in next‐generation multijunction solar cells (2011, methodology): “Later papers have given detailed calculations of energy production in MJ cells, modeling its dependence on operating cell temperature and solar spectra under representative meteorological conditions at potential sites for CPV deployment [15–18], using actual solar irradiance measurements or the SMAR”
Nanofluid-based optical filter optimization for PV/T systems (2012, methodology): “Where Eλ is the is the amount of solar irradiance per unit wavelength - data for Eλ can obtained from Gueymard [48].”
Estimating daily global solar radiation by day of year in China (2010, methodology): “Solar radiation can be estimated by means of empirical relations using other available meteorological observations [5–17], interpolating methods [18], geostationary satellite images [19], time series methods [20], stochastic weather models [21], physically radiative transfer models [22], and the art”
Evaluation of AERONET precipitable water vapor versus microwave radiometry, GPS, and radiosondes at ARM sites (2014, methodology): “…2004; Bokoye et al., 2006; Livingston et al., 2007] given as Tw 940 nmð Þ ¼ exp a mwWð Þb (2) wheremw is the relative optical water vapor air mass [e.g., Gueymard, 2001] and “a” and “b” are two coefficients that depend on the central wavelength position, width and shape of the photometer filter…”