New Developments in the Use of Location Quotients to Estimate Regional Input–Output Coefficients and Multipliers

By Timo Tohmo. 2004

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a778bd759215bd78607b14ef0610f1a1a71f982

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Francesco Chelli
2. Maria Cristina Recchioni
3. Luca Salvati
4. G. Lamonica

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Luca Salvati

Citations in the corpus

• Evaluating the FLQ and AFLQ formulae for estimating regional input coefficients: empirical evidence for the province of Córdoba, Argentina (2016, unknown): “This evidence includes, for instance, case studies of Scotland (Flegg andWebber, 2000), Finland (Tohmo, 2004; Flegg and Tohmo, 2013a, 2014) andGermany (Kowalewski, 2015).”
• Estimating Regional Input Coefficients and Multipliers: The Use of FLQ is Not a Gamble (2016, unknown): “Finally, U is Theil’s well-known inequality coefficient, which has the merit that it encompasses both bias and variance (THEIL et al., 1966).”
• The efficiency of the cross-entropy method when estimating the technical coefficients of input–output tables (2020, background): “…and weaknesses of LQmethods, including Bonfiglio and Chelli (2008), Flegg and Tohmo (2013), Harrigan, McGilvray, andMcNicoll (1980), Lamonica and Chelli (2018), Lehtonen and Tykkyläinen (2014), Kowalewksi (2015), Morrissey (2016), Oosterhaven and Cardeñoso (2011), Round (1978), and Tohmo (2004).”