Rethinking Risk Assessment: The MacArthur Study of Mental Disorder and Violence
By John Monahan, H. Steadman, Eric Silver, Paul S. Appelbaum, P. Robbins, EdwardP. Mulvey, L. Roth, Thomas Grisso, Steven M. Banks. 2001
475 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a6fa5a2338d439ce1daa0f195358ceb585dc7a6
Citations in the corpus
- The predictive validity of risk assessment tools for female offenders: A systematic review (2015, unknown): “This is particularly pertinent when assessing violence by women in the community given the proposed underreporting of female crime (Monahan et al., 2001).”
- The efficacy of violence prediction: a meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. (2010, unknown): “The use of actuarial risk assessment tools has now become an accepted standard of forensic risk assessment practice (Monahan et al,, 2001, pp.”
- Evaluating batterer counseling programs: A difficult task showing some effects and implications (2004, unknown): “Violence research in the psychiatric field ( Monahan et al., 2001 ) and recent Secret Services studies (Fein, Vossekuil, & Holden, 1995) promote this approach over the use of static risk assessment instruments at program intake.”
- The HCR‐20 in personality disordered female offenders: a comparison with a matched sample of males (2005, unknown): “Email: vdevogel@hoevenstichting.nl Gender is one of the most significant predictors of violence; regardless of age, ethnicity, culture and socioeconomic status, men are significantly more often convicted for violent offenses than women (Archer & McDaniel, 1995; Monahan et al., 2001).”
- Protective Factors in Forensic Mental Health: A New Frontier (2011, unknown): “Another example of an actuarial risk assessment method is the Iterative Classification Tree method derived from empirical data of the MacArthur Risk Assessment Study (see Monahan et al, 2001 ; Steadman et al, 2000 ).”
- The Individual Risk Assessment of Terrorism (2012, unknown): “Many risk assessment instruments for common violence “split” rather than “lump” the outcome variable (Zerubavel, 1996); that is, rather than attempt to assess the risk of violence in general, they attempt to assess the risk of specific types of violence, such as domestic violence (Hilton, Harris, & ”