A Review of Controversies about Social Representations Theory: A British Debate

By Corina Voelklein, C. Howarth. 2005

248 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a67e4491935a0044f07d36c6ee8dd271f27ca91

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. S. van der Linden

In Social Psychology

1. S. van der Linden

Citations in the corpus

• The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model (2015, background): “While certainly useful in their own right (e.g., Smith & Joffe, 2013), both SRT and the SARF framework have been criticized for being rather vague meta-theories (e.g., see Wåhlberg, 2001; Voelklein & Howarth, 2005).”
• Determinants and Measurement of Climate Change Risk Perception, Worry, and Concern (2017, background): “Accordingly, both approaches have been criticized for their vague “meta-theoretical” nature (Voelklein & Howarth, 2005; Wåhlberg, 2001), particularly because the “societal” level of analysis makes it difficult to identify and quantify the causal impact of various social influence processes on risk…”