Spatial variation of climatic and non‐climatic controls on species distribution: the range limit of Tsuga heterophylla

85 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions (2006, background): “... current distributions (Graham et al., 2004; Guisan & Thuiller, 2005; Elith et al., 2006); (2) evaluating the ability of CEMs to provide accurate estimates of the effect of climate change by comparing them with mechanistic approaches, as was done in this paper; (3) increasing understanding of the”
Forest structure and species traits mediate projected recruitment declines in western US tree species (2015, background): “Estimates of the climatic water balance account for the seasonal timing of availability of water and energy and thus represent a more mechanistic link to the limiting resources that define terrestrial species distributions and productivity (Stephenson, 1990; Gavin & Hu, 2006; Littell et al., 2008).”
Promising the future? Global change projections of species distributions (2007, background): “Some argue that including interactions precludes a transfer to new regions because of the highly specific way that variables interact in a specific region (Beerling, Huntley, & Bailey, 1995; Gavin & Hu, 2006 ).”