Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement.
By G. Piaggio, Diana Elbourne, Stuart J. Pocock, S. Evans, Douglas G. Altman. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2006
1,902 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a479c9460005b586eca24843d124cc7d60dbd75
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Douglas G. Altman
- David Moher
- K. F. Schulz
- Matthias Egger
- P. Gøtzsche
- Diana Elbourne
- Sally Hopewell
- P. Devereaux
In Statistics and Probability
- Douglas G. Altman
- David Moher
- K. F. Schulz
- Matthias Egger
- P. Gøtzsche
- Diana Elbourne
- Sally Hopewell
- P. Devereaux
Citations in the corpus
- Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies (2010, background): “In fact, many studies could be better described as equivalence studies in which a null finding is the expected outcome (Piaggio et al. 2006).”
- CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010, methodology): “[39] It is important that researchers clearly describe these aspects of their trial, including the unit of randomisation (such as patient, GP practice, lesion).”
- Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements (2016, background): “” [31] In addition to these statements, experts have encouraged [37] and published extensions to existing statements that focus on specific methodological approaches [38, 39] or clinical fields [40, 41].”