Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior : theory, research, and practical implications

By J. Fortenberry. 2003

353 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Demography, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a3db88660f86bac9bb794053ecf7f03702479ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. W. Furman
2. W. A. Collins
3. Wendy D. Manning
4. Peggy C. Giordano
5. Monica A. Longmore
6. Charlene K. Baker
7. T. Casey
8. B. McCarthy

In Demography

1. W. Furman
2. Peggy C. Giordano
3. Monica A. Longmore
4. Wendy D. Manning
5. W. A. Collins
6. K. Guzzo
7. T. Casey
8. B. McCarthy

In General Health Professions

1. Monica A. Longmore
2. Peggy C. Giordano
3. Wendy D. Manning
4. W. A. Collins
5. W. Furman
6. Ann Meier
7. Charlene K. Baker
8. Mark Helfand

Citations in the corpus

• The Female Sexual Subjectivity Inventory: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Inventory for Late Adolescents and Emerging Adults (2006, neutral): “E-mail: s.horne@bigpond.net.au or m.zimmergembeck@griffith.edu.au (Florsheim, 2003; Moore & Rosenthal, 1993).”
• Adolescent romantic relationships and experiences (2009, background): “Several edited volumes have been published (Crouter & Booth, 2006; Florsheim, 2003; Furman, Brown, & Feiring, 1999; Shulman & Collins, 1997) and a number of research laboratories are studying the nature of adolescent romantic relationships and experiences.”
• Hooking Up (2006, background): “Fortenberry (2003) noted that researchers emphasize the number of partners, frequency of sexual intercourse, and lack of condom use, thus, “problematizing” adolescent sexual activity.”