GetReal in network meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology
By O. Efthimiou, T. Debray, G. van Valkenhoef, S. Trelle, K. Panayidou, Karel G. M. Moons, Johannes B Reitsma, A. Shang, Georgia Salanti. Research Synthesis Methods, 2016
337 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a3c19f9f2a50dce244ece8903463aa0b3cd9464
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis. (2018, methodology): “NMA review authors can assess statistical incoherence between direct and indirect evidence at the paired comparison level (using local tests such as a loop-specific comparison, composite tests, node-splitting, and back calculation) or at the network level (using global tests such as the Lu and Ades ”
- netmeta: An R Package for Network Meta-Analysis Using Frequentist Methods (2023, neutral): “Given the advantages of NMA and the ease to fit models using common statistical software, its use in applied projects has been increasing rapidly in the last decade (Zarin et al. 2017; Petropoulou et al. 2017) and it represents a major research topic for methodologists (Efthimiou et al. 2015).”
- Comparative effects of 18 antipsychotics on metabolic function in patients with schizophrenia, predictors of metabolic dysregulation, and association with psychopathology: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2020, neutral): “treatment (aiming for treatment duration of 6-weeks).(9)”