Eco-labeling in commercial office markets: Do LEED and Energy Star offices obtain multiple premiums?

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Government Green Procurement Spillovers: Evidence from Municipal Building Policies in California (2014, background): “Several studies have found that LEED-certified buildings charge a three-to-fivepercent rent premium and have higher sale prices and occupancy rates (Eichholtz, Kok, and Quigley 2010, 2013; Fuerst and McAllister 2011a, 2011b; Chegut, Eichholtz, and Kok 2013).”
Performance of markets for European renewable energy certificates (2019, background): “More examples of revealed-preference analyses showing that consumers value environmental certification include Fuerst and McAllister (2011) for the US real-estate market and Elofsson et al. (2016) for the Swedish milk market.”
The role of information for energy efficiency in the residential sector (2015, unknown): “Fuerst and McAllister (2011b) did not find any effect for the commercial sector in the UK, although Chegut et al. (2013) did find it for London.”
Cities and Green Growth: A Conceptual Framework (2011, background): “17 There is less evidence available as to whether eco-labelled buildings are more profitable to developers (Fuerst and McAllister, 2011b), once any additional costs incurred to achieve the eco-label (such as specialised construction materials, filings, studies or other payments required to obtain…”