Rethinking the DSM : a psychological perspective

By L. Beutler, M. Malik. 2002

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a2f08730d9c676f52ddb69706e86e9026377ddd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Warren Mansell
2. Roz Shafran
3. Allison G. Harvey
4. E. Watkins
5. Geoffrey M. Reed
6. Susan Nolen-Hoeksema
7. Joachim Stoeber
8. F. Raes

Citations in the corpus

• Toward ICD-11: Improving the Clinical Utility of WHO's International Classification of Mental Disorders (2010, background): “Moreover, four decades of research have failed to demonstrate that the prevailing nosology for mental disorders is based on valid disease entities (e.g., Beutler & Malik, 2002; Charney et al., 2002).”
• The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Dimensional Alternative to Traditional Nosologies (2017, unknown): “Clinically, diagnosis is expected to help in selection of treatment, but the DSM and ICD are imperfect guides to care (Beutler & Malik, 2002; Bostic & Rho, 2006; Hermes, Sernyak, & Rosenheck, 2013; Mohamed & Rosenheck, 2008).”
• Cognitive Behavioural Processes Across Psychological Disorders: A Transdiagnostic Approach To Research And Treatment (2004, background): “However, there are substantial disadvantages to classification (Beutler and Malik 2002).”