Identifying a cut-off point for normal mobility: a comparison of the timed 'up and go' test in community-dwelling and institutionalised elderly women.
By H. Bischoff, H. Stähelin, A. Monsch, M. Iversen, Antje Weyh, Margot von Dechend, Regula Akos, M. Conzelmann, W. Dick, R. Theiler. Age and Ageing, 2003
785 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Geriatrics and Gerontology, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a1734a7c0fd1bc127d6c88daf6a485df9be9aaf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geriatrics and Gerontology
In Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
Citations in the corpus
- Reference Values for the Timed Up and Go Test: A Descriptive Meta‐Analysis (2006, background): “RESULTS Table 1 summarizes the specifics of the 21 studies included in the meta-analysis.(9-11,16-33) There is considerable diversity in”
- Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis (2018, background): “…performance Gait speed ≤0.8 m/s Cruz-Jentoft (2010) [1] Studenski (2011) [84] SPPB ≤8 point score Pavasini (2016) [90] Guralnik (1995) [126] TUG ≥20 s Bischoff (2003) [127] 400 m walk test Non-completion or ≥6 min for completion Newman (2006) [128] D o w n lo a d e d fro m h ttp s ://a c a d e m…”