Multi-objective Optimization
By Kalyanmoy Deb. 2014
373 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Control and Systems Engineering, Optimization & Training
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Caiming Xiong
- Richard Socher
- Nitish Shirish Keskar
- Bryan McCann
- Mohit Bansal
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Yejin Choi
- Jianfeng Gao
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Patrick Mannion
- Ann Nowé
- Xinbang Zhang
- Qian Zhang
- Diederik Marijn Roijers
- Yukang Chen
- Richard Socher
- Caiming Xiong
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Ann Nowé
- Xinbang Zhang
- Qian Zhang
- Diederik Marijn Roijers
- Yukang Chen
- Richard Socher
- Caiming Xiong
- Xinggang Wang
In Optimization & Training
- Nitish Shirish Keskar
- Caiming Xiong
- Richard Socher
- Bryan McCann
- Ann Nowé
- Xinbang Zhang
- Qian Zhang
- Yukang Chen
Citations in the corpus
- The Natural Language Decathlon: Multitask Learning as Question Answering (2018, background): “Multi-objective optimization [Deb, 2014] naturally connects to multitask learning and typically involves querying a decision-maker who weighs different objectives.”
- Economic and life cycle environmental optimization of forest-based biorefinery supply chains for bioenergy and biofuel production (2016, positive): “The ε-constraint method is one of the most widely used generating approaches (Deb, 2005).”
- Compressing Large-Scale Transformer-Based Models: A Case Study on BERT (2020, neutral): “For uniformity, all model sizes and speedups reported here are for the final complete model after compression and are compared against BERT BASE , even if the method was originally applied to BERT LARGE .”
- Multi-objective multi-agent decision making: a utility-based analysis and survey (2019, background): “Multi-objective optimisation (MOO) [21] approaches consider these possibly conflicting objectives explicitly.”
- EAT-NAS: elastic architecture transfer for accelerating large-scale neural architecture search (2019, methodology): “ion. Some constraints are added to the scale of the model within an acceptable range to avoid the memory running out of control during search. On CIFAR-10, the total expansion ratio is limited within [4, 10]. For training during the search process, the batch size is set as 128. We use SGD optimizer ”