Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate?

By Neeraj Arora, C. McHorney. Medical Care, 2000

632 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Resistance to Medical Artificial Intelligence (2019, neutral): “Prior research on medical decision making has explored how factors such as degree of desired autonomy (Botti et al. 2009), degree of involvement (Arora and McHorney 2000), and employment of decision aids (Ubel 2002) influence medical decisions.”
Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians' communication behavior. (2003, background): “…established an association between relatively stable patient characteristics such as age and education and patient participation preferences (e.g., Arora & McHorney, 2000; Cassileth et al., 1980; Degner et al., 1997), recent research in primary care has also demonstrated a relationship between…”
Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review. (2006, background): “Arora and McHorney, using data from 2197 patients with chronic diseases, found that patients with severe diabetes or heart disease were less likely than patients with mild hypertension to prefer an active role [16].”
Returning Individual Research Results to Participants: Guidance for a New Research Paradigm (2018, background): “Expert- identified criteria do not always reflect participant preferences and values (Arora and McHorney, 2000; Epstein and Street, 2011; Epstein et al., 2010; Guyatt et al., 2004; Little et al., 2001).”