Cases for the nugget in modeling computer experiments

By Robert B. Gramacy, Herbert K. H. Lee. Statistics and computing, 2010

303 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Most surrogate models for computer experiments are interpolators, and the most common interpolator is a Gaussian process (GP) that deliberately omits a small-scale (measurement) error term called the nugget. The explanation is that computer experiments are, by definition, “deterministic”, and so there is no measurement error. We think this is too narrow a focus for a computer experiment and a statistically inefficient way to model them. We show that estimating a (non-zero) nugget can lead to surrogate models with better statistical properties, such as predictive accuracy and coverage, in a variety of common situations.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/59eccbff80ecf6e16fd6211f57ae5b84e9931189

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Yinhao Zhu
  2. Nicholas Zabaras
  3. Yew-Soon Ong
  4. Jianfei Cai
  5. Haitao Liu
  6. Victor Picheny
  7. David Ginsbourger
  8. V. Roshan Joseph

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. Mark A. Girolami
  2. Yew-Soon Ong
  3. Jianfei Cai
  4. Haitao Liu
  5. V. Roshan Joseph
  6. Shan Ba
  7. Daniel W. Apley
  8. Joseph Guinness

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Nicholas Zabaras
  2. Yinhao Zhu
  3. Mark A. Girolami
  4. Ilias Bilionis
  5. V. Roshan Joseph
  6. Shan Ba
  7. Yew-Soon Ong
  8. Jianfei Cai

Citations in the corpus