Judge-Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: A Partial Replication of Kalven & Zeisel's The American Jury

By T. Eisenberg, Paula Hannaford-Agor, V. Hans, Nicole L. Waters, G. T. Munsterman, Stewart J. Schwab, Martin T. Wells. 2004

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/59da12bde1c3569f2559c285927240cfab89ed4a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Christian Thni
2. Kristoffel Grechenig
3. Andreas Nicklisch
4. B. Bornstein
5. Edie Greene

Citations in the corpus

• Punishment Despite Reasonable Doubt - A Public Goods Experiment with Sanctions Under Uncertainty (2010, background): “…in groups in such a way that cooperation is optimal from a welfare 1Compare, e.g., Png (1986), Rubinfeld and Sappington (1987), Andreoni (1991), Volokh (1997), Rachlinski and Jourden (2003), Eisenberg et al. (2005), Lando (2006) Polinsky and Shavell (2007), and Eisenberg and Hans (forthcoming).”
• Jury Decision Making: Implications For and From Psychology (2011, background): “Overall, though, judges agree with jury verdicts roughly 75% to 80% of the time (Eisenberg et al., 2005), and this high rate of agreement occurs across cases of varying factual and legal complexity.”