Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection

By M. Rowe, D. Kielpinski, V. Meyer, C. Sackett, W. Itano, Christopher R. Monroe, David J. Wineland. Nature, 2001

1,008 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Physiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/59d5a0408011616300dc354004f3c7d38eeea9ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Gregg Jaeger
2. Rainer Blatt
3. C. F. Roos
4. Otfried Gühne
5. Ronald Hanson
6. H. Häffner
7. A. Aspect
8. A. Reiserer

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. Gregg Jaeger
2. Rainer Blatt
3. Ronald Hanson
4. C. F. Roos
5. Otfried Gühne
6. H. Häffner
7. A. Aspect
8. A. Reiserer

In Physiology

1. Gregg Jaeger
2. Gilles Pisier
3. Roman Schnabel

Citations in the corpus

• Random numbers certified by Bell’s theorem (2009, neutral): “The observed CHSH violation of ^ I ~ 2 : 414 represents a substantial improvement over previous results 26,27 .”
• Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres (2015, methodology): “First, we analyze the data under the assumptions that the Bell trials are independent of each other, that the recorded random input bits have zero predictability and that the outcomes follow a Gaussian distribution, similar to previous work[4-9].”
• State-independent experimental test of quantum contextuality (2009, background): “Experiments processing quantum information with trapped ions[21] are particularly well-suited for this purpose as arbitrary two-qubit quantum states Ψ can be deterministically generated by laser-ion interactions and measured with near-unit efficiency[6].”
• Arbitrarily loss-tolerant Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering allowing a demonstration over 1 km of optical fiber with no detection loophole (2011, background): “[15] M.”
• Quantum simulations with trapped ions (2011, background): “Here, the spin–spin interactions are effective interactions arising from off-resonant coupling to the motional sidebands (3), (4) in a regime where the ion–motion coupling strength is much smaller than the detuning of the lasers.”
• Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles (2016, methodology): “This method is used especially for ions (Rowe et al., 2001) but also finds application for atomic ensembles.”
• Bell Nonlocality (2013, background): “…being said, it’s also important to put to record that nonlocality without the fair sampling assumption has been observed, first in an experiment with entangled ions (Rowe et al., 2001), then in several other platforms, including of course the three “loophole-free” experiments of 2015 cited above.”
• Viewpoint: Closing the Door on Einstein and Bohr’s Quantum Debate (2015, background): “also addressed with other systems, in particular using ions instead of photons [24, 25], but none of them tackled simultaneously the locality loophole.”