Thermal boundary resistance at the graphene-oil interface

By Deepthi Konatham, A. Striolo. 2009

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Magnetically-Functionalized Self-Aligning Graphene Fillers for High-Efficiency Thermal Management Applications (2015, background): “The theory considerations for graphene composites [28,29] and experimental results for other types of fillers suggest that a strong increase”
Graphene-enhanced hybrid phase change materials for thermal management of Li-ion batteries (2013, background): “ anisotropic increase in the heat conduction was attributed to graphene’s planar geometry and strong coupling to the octane molecules resulting in the corresponding decrease in the Kapitza resistance [31, 32, 33]. This means that heat carrying phonon modes excited in graphene can couple well to thos”
Thermal conductivity enhancement of lauric acid phase change nanocomposite with graphene nanoplatelets (2015, unknown): “[39] predicts the TBC of functionalized graphene/oil interfaces to be in the range of 50e270 MW m 2 K 1.”
Thermal properties of graphene and nanostructured carbon materials. (2011, background): “can depend strongly on the surface roughness, presence or absence of suspended regions in graphene layers, and methods of graphene preparation. MD simulations found that TBR at graphene-oil interface [104, 107] is similar or smaller than that at the graphene-solid interfaces [104 - 107]. Low TBR of ”