Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study of Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads

By Anja Lambrecht, Catherine E. Tucker. 2019

504 citations recorded by the source corpus.

. We explore data from a fi eld test of how an algorithm delivered ads promoting job opportunities in the science, technology, engineering and math fi elds. This ad was explicitly intended to be gender neutral in its delivery. Empirically, however, fewer women saw the ad than men. This happened because younger women are a prized demographic and are more expensive to show ads to. An algorithm that simply optimizes cost-effectiveness in ad delivery will deliver ads that were intended to be gender neutral in an apparently discriminatory way, because of crowding out. We show that this empirical regularity extends to other major digital platforms.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, AI Ethics, Fairness & Society

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Ming-Hui Huang
  2. Roland T. Rust
  3. Xia Hu
  4. Mengnan Du
  5. Samuel R. Bowman
  6. Abeba Birhane

In Marketing

  1. Ming-Hui Huang
  2. Roland T. Rust
  3. Will Sutherland
  4. Xia Hu
  5. Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi
  6. Abeba Birhane
  7. Xueming Luo
  8. Peter C. Verhoef

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Meena Jagadeesan
  2. Roland T. Rust
  3. Christina Ilvento
  4. Ming-Hui Huang
  5. Cynthia Dwork
  6. Will Sutherland
  7. Xia Hu
  8. Anthony Ventresque

In AI Ethics, Fairness & Society

  1. Cynthia Dwork
  2. Anthony Ventresque
  3. Elayne Ruane
  4. Samuel R. Bowman
  5. Christina Ilvento
  6. Abeba Birhane
  7. Shikha Bordia

Citations in the corpus