Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction

By F. Frassinetti, N. Bolognini, E. Làdavas. 2002

457 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, Social Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sensory Systems

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Expectation Learning for Adaptive Crossmodal Stimuli Association (2018, background): “tion allows us to enhance our perceptual experience [1] also for unisensory stimuli [2], to solve associative incongruence and conflicts [3], and to learn new concepts [4].”
Multisensory Interplay Reveals Crossmodal Influences on ‘Sensory-Specific’ Brain Regions, Neural Responses, and Judgments (2008, unknown): “For recent examples regarding spatial constraints , see Frassinetti et al. (2002), for temporal constraints, see Fendrich and Corballis (2001) and Recanzone (2003), for combined spatiotemporal constraints, see Zampini et al. (2003); see also Vatakis and Spence (2007) for further discussion.”
Developmental changes in the multisensory temporal binding window persist into adolescence (2012, background): “…with humans have reinforced this principle by showing that multisensory-mediated performance gains are largest at short temporal offsets and are generally reduced and ultimately eliminated when stimuli are significantly temporally misaligned (e.g. Corneil & Munoz, 1996; Frassinetti et al., 2002).”
Semantic congruence is a critical factor in multisensory behavioral performance (2004, background): “1994; Frens and Van Opstal 1998; Harrington and Peck 1998), and lower the thresholds for stimulus detection (Frassinetti et al. 2002; Lovelace et al. 2003).”
Diffusion tensor imaging shows white matter tracts between human auditory and visual cortex (2011, unknown): “only at very limited locations of the visual field (Beer et al. 2011; Frassinetti et al. 2002; Meyer et al. 2005).”
Sound-Induced Enhancement of Low-Intensity Vision: Multisensory Influences on Human Sensory-Specific Cortices and Thalamic Bodies Relate to Perceptual Enhancement of Visual Detection Sensitivity (2010, background): “Given some previous multisensory research (McDonald et al., 2000; Vroomen and de Gelder, 2000; Frassinetti et al., 2002; Noesselt et al., 2008), and past proposals associated with the possible function of the putative principle of inverse effectiveness (Stein et al.”
Eccentricity dependent auditory enhancement of visual stimulus detection but not discrimination (2013, result): “While this can be taken as evidence for an overall enhancement of visual detection by acoustic inputs regardless of multisensory congruency, other studies reported more specific effects (Frassinetti et al., 2002; Bolognini et al., 2005).”
Modeling development of natural multi-sensory integration using neural self-organisation and probabilistic population codes (2015, background): “Among the beneﬁts of integrating signals from different modalities are shorter reaction times, greater perceptual accuracy, and lower thresholds of stimulus detection (Ernst & Banks, 2002; Frassinetti et al., 2002; Gori et al., 2008; Neil et al., 2006).”
Spatial attention can modulate audiovisual integration at multiple cortical and subcortical sites (2009, background): “Multisensory integration (MI) is advantageous in interactions with the environment, where multisensory input can reduce sensory uncertainty (McDonald et al., 2000; Frassinetti et al., 2002).”
Audiovisual Synchrony Improves Motion Discrimination via Enhanced Connectivity between Early Visual and Auditory Areas (2010, background): “, 1986) and improved detection of simple visual targets when accompanied by synchronous tones (Vroomen and de Gelder, 2000; Frassinetti et al., 2002; Noesselt et al., 2008; Olivers and Van der Burg, 2008).”